IN THIS ISSUE:

Tribunal dismisses Eli Lilly’s NAFTA challenge on promise utility doctrine »

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses Teva’s appeal relating to utility and sufficiency »

Ontario Superior Court dismisses summary judgment motion in Lansoprazole Section 8 Claim »

Apotex seeks leave on omeprazole formulation patent »

Bill C-30 passes second reading in the Senate »

Health Canada updates guidance to reflect recent amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations »

New Court proceedings »

Tribunal dismisses Eli Lilly’s NAFTA challenge on promise utility doctrine

by Shirley Liang Komosa »

As previously reported, Eli Lilly submitted claims to international arbitration under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) seeking damages from the Government of Canada, asserting that the Canadian courts' application of the promise doctrine to Eli Lilly's STRATTERA (atomoxetine) and ZYPREXA (olanzapine) patents (“Patents”) contravenes Canada's obligations under NAFTA.

On March 16, 2017, the Tribunal issued its Final Award dismissing Eli Lilly’s claims. On the merits of the claims, the Tribunal found that Eli Lilly had failed to demonstrate (1) that the promise doctrine constitutes a fundamental or dramatic change in the utility requirement under Canadian patent law or (2) that the promise doctrine is arbitrary and/or discriminatory.

Read more »


Federal Court of Appeal dismisses Teva’s appeal relating to utility and sufficiency

by Abigail E. Smith »

On March 14, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Teva’s appeal of Locke J.’s Order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a notice of compliance (NOC) to Teva in respect of its calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate ointment (Leo Pharma’s DOVOBET) until the expiry of Patent No. 2,370,565: Teva Canada Limited v Leo Pharma Inc, 2017 FCA 50. The patent covers a three-component, non-aqueous ointment used in the treatment of psoriasis. The ointment is comprised of vitamin D or a vitamin D analogue (Component A), a corticosteroid (Component B), and a solvent (Component C). Teva’s appeal related to sound prediction and sufficiency.

Read more »


Ontario Superior Court dismisses summary judgment motion in Lansoprazole Section 8 Claim

by Kevin Siu »

On February 27, 2017, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (2017 ONSC 1348) dismissed a motion for summary judgment brought by Abbott Laboratories and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the defendants in an action for damages brought by Apotex under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations).

Read more »


Apotex seeks leave on omeprazole formulation patent

As previously reported, on January 12, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal affirmed the validity of AstraZeneca’s Patent No. 1,292,693: Apotex Inc v AstraZeneca Canada Inc, 2017 FCA 9. On March 13, 2017, Apotex applied to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal (docket no. 37478).


Bill C-30 passes second reading in the Senate

On March 7, 2017, Bill C-30 passed second reading in the Senate and was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Bill C-30 implements the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union (CETA). As previously reported, it was introduced in the Senate on February 14, 2017. The European Parliament voted to approve CETA on February 15, 2017. CETA's implications for pharmaceuticals were reported here.


Health Canada updates guidance to reflect recent amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations

On March 14, 2017, Health Canada issued guidance and provided instruction relating to amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations flowing from the Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (Shortages of Drugs and Discontinuation of Sale of Drugs).

  • The guidance document Fees for the Right to Sell Drugs was updated to reflect amendments that mandate the reporting of drug shortages and discontinuations by authorization holders to a third-party website for certain categories of drugs that have the potential, in a shortage or discontinuation situation, to adversely affect the health of Canadians.
    Notice: Guidance Document – Fees for the Right to Sell Drugs

  • A new guidance document entitled Cancellation of a Drug Identification Number (DIN) and Notification of the Discontinuation of Sales was released. The amendments introduce a new definition of the term “discontinue” and require manufacturers to notify Health Canada within 30 days of the discontinuation of the sale of a drug. This new guidance is intended to facilitate proper compliance with these provisions.
    Notice: Guidance Document: Cancellation of a Drug Identification Number (DIN) and Notification of the Discontinuation of Sales

  • Lastly, Health Canada outlined significant changes to the information to be included in the Annual Drug Notification Form (ADNF) resulting from the amendments. These include separate lists for products that have been assigned a DIN but have not been marketed (Approved Products) and products which are marketed but have not had sales for 12 consecutive months (Dormant Products). Additionally, manufacturers will be required to provide further information regarding products listed as discontinued on the ADNF. These changes will be incorporated into the ADNF that will be sent to manufacturers in June of 2017.
    Notice: Upcoming Changes to the Annual Drug Notification Form


PMNOC proceedings

Medicine:

perindopril arginine (ARCOSYL)

Applicants:

Les Laboratoires Servier and Servier Canada Inc

Respondents:

Apotex Inc and the Minister of Health

Date Commenced:

March 3, 2017

Court File No.:

T-306-17

Comment:

Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of Patent No. 2,423,825. Apotex alleges invalidity (double patenting, improper selection, insufficiency, obviousness, inutility, overbreadth, and anticipation).

Other Proceedings

Medicine:

aripiprazole (ABILIFY)

Plaintiffs:

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co, Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc

Defendants:

Apotex Inc and Apotex Pharmachem Inc

Date Commenced:

February 14, 2017

Court File No.:

T-200-17

Comment:

Action for infringement of Patents Nos. 2,426,921; 2,689,052; 2,688,934; 2,688,915; 2,689,051; and 2,429,496.

Medicine:

unidentified

Applicants:

Canada RNA Biochemical Inc and Martin Kwok

Respondent:

Minister of Health

Date Commenced:

February 27, 2017

Court File No.:

T-278-17

Comment:

Application for Order requiring the Minister of Health to produce documents requested pursuant to the Access to Information Act.

Medicine:

unidentified

Applicants:

BIE Health Products O/B 2037839 Ontario Ltd and Richard Beemer

Respondent:

Minister of Health

Date Commenced:

February 27, 2017

Court File No.:

T-277-17

Comment:

Application for Order requiring the Minister of Health to produce documents requested pursuant to the Access to Information Act.

To check the status of Federal Court cases, please click here.

Follow @smartbiggar

RANKINGS AND RECOGNITIONS

Smart & Biggar honoured as the Canadian Patent Contentious Firm of the Year and Gunars Gaikis named Canadian Patent Litigation Attorney of the Year by LMG Life Sciences
Read more »

Smart & Biggar named Canada’s Intellectual Property Litigation Firm of the Year for three years in a row and nine leading IP litigators recognized in the area of intellectual property by Benchmark Canada
Read more »

Smart & Biggar recognized by Managing Intellectual Property as Canadian Trademark Contentious Firm of the Year for the fourth consecutive year and Milestone Case of the Year for North America.
Read more »

Nancy Pei selected to be on Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars list of the Top 250 Women in IP for 2016
Read more »

Smart & Biggar honoured as one of only two Canadian firms selected as a ‘Band One’ firm in Canadian intellectual property law in the 2017 edition of Chambers Canada
Read more »

Smart & Biggar once again leads in Canadian IP law as the only firm chosen at the top of the rankings in Ottawa, Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver in the 2016 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory
Read more »

Smart & Biggar lauded at the “top level of the Canadian market” in the 2016 edition of IAM Patent 1000 — The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners
Read more »

Smart & Biggar chosen for the third year in a row as the Best Canadian IP Firm at The International Legal Alliance Summit & Awards
Read more »

David Schwartz named the 2016 Biotechnology Law "Lawyer of the Year" in Ottawa by Best Lawyers
Read more »

The future is bright: Smart & Biggar dominates Canadian IP in LMG Rising Stars rankings
Read more »

26 Smart & Biggar lawyers recognized in the 2016 edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada
Read more »

For more information or to request a copy of any decision, pleading or legislation, please contact:

Nancy Pei (Editor)

 

 

 

CASE-LAW BRIEFS BY:
Andrew Mandlsohn
Kevin Siu

 
Urszula Wojtyra
Shirley Liang Komosa

 
Paul Jorgensen
Brandon Heard

 
Abigail Smith

LITIGATION CONTACTS
Gunars Gaikis
Nancy Pei

 
Steven Garland
Mark Biernacki

 
Sheldon Hamilton
Jeremy Want

 
Yoon Kang
Colin Ingram

PROSECUTION CONTACTS
Christopher Robinson
David Schwartz

 
Yoon Kang

 
Daphne Lainson

 
Thuy Nguyen

REGULATORY CONTACTS
Nancy Pei

 
Daphne Lainson

 

 

DISCLAIMER

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and regulatory law of interest to the pharmaceutical industry. The contents of this newsletter are informational only and do not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh

Ottawa   /   Toronto   /   Montreal   /   Vancouver   /   Calgary

smart-biggar.ca

If you do not wish to receive future mailings of this kind (seminar invitations, greeting cards, notification of legal developments), please access the Manage Your Subscription link below to unsubscribe and to manage your settings.